Chef at Large

Recipes, Reviews and more stuff on food.

The myth of the Indian Curry

By Sid • Jan 12th, 2008 • Category: Asian Food, Indian Food, Posts

I’ve been hearing about the ‘Indian ’ for quite a while, from multiple sources. I’ve seen it in restaurant menus in the UK ‘ with Indian ’, seen it published on websites - someone asks ‘how do you make Indian ?’, and a kindly (uninformed) soul pops out of nowhere and shares a recipe for ‘Indian ’. Then again, I’ve seen people ask for ‘traditional Indian recipes’ and an NRI type posts a recipe that contains stock, whipping cream and truffles.

After countless such incidents here’s a ready reckoner for any freaks out there, who are interested in some authentic information:

  1. There is nothing called ‘Indian ’: India is a country with countless cultures and numerous sub cultures. Since each culture has its own rendition of , there really is nothing called ‘Indian ’. Take a north Indian housewife cooking, lets say, and peas (matar mushroom) - she’ll saute some , add a pinch of , a dash of , a generous dose of a generic ‘Kitchen King ’ (which is a mixture of used to add flavor to most quick north Indian preparations), add the peas, followed by the , a bit of water, and she’s done. Someone in south India would differ by omitting the ‘Kitchen King ‘, add black mustard, leaves etc. Those in the East of India would probably simply add ginger, , , salt, chilli, water and meat, then cook it till its done. A Malayali cook would add coconut milk and omit various ingredients. A Gujarati cook would add a pinch of or gur (a kind of molasses) without any leaves. There are many variations. There is therefore, nothing called ‘Indian ’ - only a style of cooking that uses fresh ingredients and ends up with tasty, dishes.
  2. Indian preparations typically do not use stock: With very few exceptions ( perhaps), there are no Indian preparations that use pre-made vegetable or meat stock. We cook everything on the fire in front of us and rarely use pre-fabs of any sort. This of course applies to authentic Indian cooking.
  3. Adding a generous dose of powder and with does not result in . It has to be balanced. I remember eating a ‘ ’ from a restaurant in the UK. It was a restaurant, so I didn’t expect what landed on my table - tender pieces of , swimming in thick gravy - a mixture of , ginger and . That, my friend, is not ‘’. It is, a mixture of , ginger and - not … and definitely not Indian.

On a parting note, ‘ Tikka ’ did not originate in India - it is a British creation. :-)

Sid

Share this:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
StumbleUpon It!

You may also like these posts:

Tagged as: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sid is a self confessed food addict who likes cooking, writing and photography... and travel, if it gets him closer to a good book and interesting food.
Email this author | All posts by Sid

Please keep it polite and pleasant. Comments containing racist, vulgar or obscene overtones/elements will be moderated and possibly deleted.

Leave a Reply